************* The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org ************
24.01.2013, 23:09, "trom-requ...@lists.newciv.org" <trom-requ...@lists.newciv.org>: > Send Trom mailing list submissions to > trom@lists.newciv.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > trom-requ...@lists.newciv.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > trom-ow...@lists.newciv.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Trom digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Cross Packaging? again (Pete McLaughlin) > 2. TROM Kindle Version Update (Pete McLaughlin) > 3. Re: Cross Packaging? again (Pete McLaughlin) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:18:50 -0800 (PST) > From: Pete McLaughlin <pete_mclaughlin_93...@yahoo.com> > To: The Resolution of Mind list <trom@lists.newciv.org> > Subject: Re: [TROM1] Cross Packaging? again > Message-ID: > <1359044330.19856.yahoomail...@web160906.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi Paul and Svoboda > Thanks for the responces. They got my brain working again. > > Here is what i have come up with so far. > > the normal to sex goals package has male and female complementing each other. > > 1. must sex??? 3. must be sexed > > by making females and males opponents in a game we move the female postulate > to the opponents position and the negative female postulate to the > complementary position. > > 1. must sex??? 3 must not be sexed > > 2. must not sex?? 4 must be sexed > > This is by definition a cross package as 1 and 3 are not exactly > complementary. > > Does this look like a correct interpretation of Dennis' statement that: > > ?"As a male, he soon starts to get opposed to females, and > vice-versa. Very soon he is in a terrible state on the subject, for the > two genders are not intrinsically in opposition to each other. > > ?You end up with a classic case of > cross-packaging. We find the male desperately asserting his masculinity, > while heavily suppressing any feminine characteristics in his > personality, and vice-versa for the female. The whole subject soon takes > on the quality of a nightmare, and becomes one big unsolvable problem. > And it stays this way until the being regains his full freedom of choice > to occupy, at will, any one of the four classes available to him on the > subject." > > IF so then on any goals in life if you make what should be a complementary > postulate into the opposition postulate in a game you are cross packaging. > > Keep on TROMing > Pete > >> ________________________________ >> From: Paul Tipon <pti...@proftitleserv.com> >> To: trom@lists.newciv.org >> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 12:19 AM >> Subject: [TROM1] Cross Packaging? again >> >> ************* >> The following message is relayed to you by? trom@lists.newciv.org >> ************ >> Hi Pete, >> >> After reading further, I see that I may have muddied the waters a little >> more.? With the following definition here is what I see. >> >> On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:44 AM, trom-requ...@lists.newciv.org wrote: >>> OK >>> Here's the definition of cross packaging. it doesn't apply so Dennis >>> misspoke in the TROM manual. >>> >>> Cross-packaging >>> When a junior package is not erasing cleanly the most common fault is that >>> the package is not a true package.? This is known as >>> cross-packaging.? It is one of the 'deadly' sins.? When two or more junior >>> packages are crossed up into one package neither of the packages will erase >>> and the whole mish-mash just grinds on forever.? The therapist who tries to >>> resolve a man's drinking problem by addressing his infantile sex life is >>> guilty of cross-packaging.? This is why the 'therapy' goes on forever with >>> no relief for the patient. >> The packages are not the little differences that exist between the sexes, >> male to female or female to male but the fact that male is different than >> female and vice versa.? So it is not the differences that exist between a >> male and a female but the simple fact that male is different than female and >> female different than male.? To heck with all the differences thereby >> derived, it is that male is not female and female is not male. >> >> With two separate things which are not the duplicate of the other, there >> will always be a difference.? To then go into all the differences that one >> can spot between the two sexes will not address the basic.? So one can >> process out all of the differences that they can find between sexes and >> totally miss the basic.? The basic is that one sex is not the other. >> >> So if one then processes on those differences between two items, one may >> miss the fact that there is an opposition and games condition because there >> are two different things, not that there are two or more differences in >> sexual characteristics.? Basically not being able to see the forest for the >> trees.? Processing out all the different trees and all of their differences >> between each other will not process out the opposition terminal of the >> forest.? Just process on 'the forest'.? As in Dennis' sample, process >> alcohol not "infantile sex life".? A person may give you or you yourself may >> give yourself housekeeping as the opposition subject when it is really male >> vs female or female vs male and nothing more non-esoteric than that. >> >> I believe Dennis calls this 'Cross-Packaging' as all crossed or mixed up and >> not addressing the correct item. >> >> Paul, Level 5 in progress >> _______________________________________________ >> Trom mailing list >> Trom@lists.newciv.org >> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://lists.newciv.org/pipermail/trom/attachments/20130124/25bf153b/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:25:20 -0800 (PST) > From: Pete McLaughlin <pete_mclaughlin_93...@yahoo.com> > To: TROM <trom@lists.newciv.org> > Subject: [TROM1] TROM Kindle Version Update > Message-ID: > <1359051920.10299.yahoomail...@web160902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > HI > I see a few of you have downloaded the new Kindle TROM manual.? I just > updated it with this note under the Cross-Packaging section: > > (Note. you can make a cross package in life by making things your enemy that > normally are not. E.g. if a male makes females the opponent in his sex games > he is taking the complementary postulates 1.must sex /3. must be sexed and > making them opposed. The package looks like this:? > > 1. must sex?? ? ? ? 3 must not be sexed > > 2. must not sex?? 4. must be sexed > > with 1 opposed to 4 and 1 not an exact complement of 3 you end up cross > packaged.-editor) > > You can download the latest update from the same location you downloaded the > first version. > > www.tromhelp.com/services > > The Resolution of Mind.PRC > > Keep on TROMing > Pete "1. must sex?? ? ? ? 3 must not be sexed > > 2. must not sex?? 4. must be sexed > > with 1 opposed to 4 and 1 not an exact complement of 3 you end up cross > packaged.-editor)" is the error in this example? _______________________________________________ Trom mailing list Trom@lists.newciv.org http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
