************* The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org ************ Hi Paul,
I'm just stating what Dennis has covered quite well. The universe consists of life & postulates. If that is so then a gold bar IS the postulate setup itself and nothing more. It's sensation mass which is brought about by postulates (is and isn't held simultaneously - i.e. TIPM) Thinking is below the level of creating. This is why positive thinking doesn't get one very far. -----Original Message----- From: Paul Tipon [mailto:pti...@proftitleserv.com] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 2:23 PM To: The Resolution of Mind list Subject: Re: [TROM1] Too much attention on postulates from the past Hi Brian, Comments interspersed below. On Jan 28, 2014, at 1:48 PM, TROM wrote: > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org > ************ > I'd just clarify that a postulate is not a statement. For lack of a better metaphor of what as a spirit, one is doing, the word statement was used. A better description would be 'a mental statement' or perhaps even better, a 'spiritual thought by the spirit, strictly in spiritual thought terms' to have something occur. > Thinking that postulates are some verbalization is not correct. This is true and I had no intention to mislead and I didn't say it was a verbalization. > A postulate of gold bars IS the gold bars, the postulate IS the > thing itself. Existence is not brought about by a via of making a > statement about existence. > I would say that 'THE' gold bars are the result of a postulate. They are not the postulate. The gold bars appear for they are the result of a postulate made about gold bars coming into existence. Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Tipon [mailto:pti...@proftitleserv.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 1:52 AM > To: trom@lists.newciv.org > Subject: [TROM1] Too much attention on postulates from the past > > A postulate is a postulate. A positive postulate is positive and the > simplest example is, (blank) will be this and so and so. This > postulate can be positive at its inception yet in the future it may > not fit the circumstances and thereby then be a negative or counter > postulate. The same is true for an 'in the beginning' negative > postulate as time progresses. > > So how does one not booby trap themselves with negative and positive > postulates? How can one tell whether or not a postulate will wrongly > apply at some future time in totally different circumstances. Well > unless you can foretell the future for every postulate you and anyone > else ever made, you can't. > > Boy does this ever sound like a booby trapped loosing game, huh. > > Well if you want it to be ... it sure is. Then too even if you don't > want it to be, it sure is or is that 'is not'. For one cannot > foretell the future of any and all postulates made by you and > everyone else across all of time. > > Now let's go back and look into what a postulate really is. A > postulate is a statement that brings an is-ness into existence. So a > statement of an is-ness is a postulate. And, an as-isness is a > postulate that states a truth if one has made a true statement of as- > isness. Such a statement also has the power to as-is and if done > thoroughly has the power to vanish the is-ness. > > Now all this brings into this discussion alter-isness and not- > isness. Alter-isness is a postulate that changes something, a > postulate into something else, an altered-isness or an altered > postulate. Damn! There we go! Postulates can be altered. But what > about that last remaining one, not-isness. > > Well a not is-ness is a postulate counter to a postulate and it sets > up a force/counter force. It does not is-ness it, as-is it or alter- > isness it and certainly doesn't as-isness it. Darn! I guess we > would have to call this a ridge. Interesting thing about this ridge > is that it is timeless for the force/counter force are locked, one > against the other and remain that way regardless of time. These > ridges are then energy against energy and they go nowhere with > respect to each other and therefore no motion means that no time > passes for these two forces because there is no motion between them > for the space that they occupy. Matter is a special example of this. > > Oh, that means that is-ness, as-isness and alter-isness can change > this force/counter force arrangement. Hmmmmmmmm! > > So postulates are altered, vanished or new postulates put in at any > time in the future can change this force/counter force postulate. > Hey! That's just like stated above. > > So in other words, one who is good at postulating and employing the 4 > methods of existence can change any and all postulates, past, present > and future. > > Well damn damn damn. All one has to do is use any type of postulate > except for the not-isness postulate, huh. > > Don't think I have another worry in all of 'existence' now. Counter > postulates are not the bugaboo but not employing the other three > types of is-ness to bringing things into or out of existence is the > problem. I also see that postulates do not necessarily last forever > but can be changed with is-ness, as-isness and alter-isness. > > What a relief!!!! Does this help anyone else? > > TROM with RI and TimeBreaking is an exercise at employing all of the > 4 states of existence and when you can apply any of the 3 states > other than not-isness, one regains the use of their ability to > postulate for their and others good. Just realize that if you get > too good at this you can vanish all and create all newness or re- > create the old. That includes you, yourself. > > Oh and another thing. All the levels in Level 4 & 5 are postulate/ > counter postulate. So if one can get through Level 4 and any of the > 8 situations, A & B, then they must be doing pretty good at handling > counter postulates and finally just kicking them out of the way with > the slightest of effort and attention is the final achievement of > TROM. After all, games barriers are nothing but postulate/counter > postulates. Likewise the walls in a maze all by themselves are > postulate/counter postulates and just stand there. Will you use > force (overts) or intelligence and spiritual, Theta abilities to > navigate through Life. > > p.s.: This area of the 4 'Conditions of Existence' is one area that > Dennis short shrifted and in doing so did not get all of the truth > into Level 4 & 5 of TROM. > > > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > Trom@lists.newciv.org > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom > _______________________________________________ Trom mailing list Trom@lists.newciv.org http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
