************* The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org ************
Hello, Pete,
Thank you for further explaining your viewpoint about the importance of to be known. For myself, it still brings up the question of what was the postulate before we created "not-selfs"? I refer to the surprise game before we created that other terminal. I wanted to know a surprise, right? I don't see myself necessarily wanting that object of surprise to know me. To be known seems more reflexive at that stage. At that stage, who is it I am really knowing and being known by? So, even in the absence of others, to know and to be known seem intertwined. I can't see the emphasis of must be known coming before must know, although the phrase, "know thyself" comes to mind. Perhaps a logic formula? If you go all the way back to you forming that postulate set, what problem were you trying to solve, if I may ask that question. What was going on with you before you formed that postulate matrix? This question may not be valid and may be misleading. colleen
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list Trom@lists.newciv.org http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
