*************
The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
************
David,
appreciate your idea of "multiple polarities of knowledge", including
those on the extreme outskirts. Enables the explorer to get a look at
the whole instead of a key-hole perspective only.
Good expeditions,
Robin
----
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 18:00:02 +0200, <[email protected]> wrote:
Send TROM mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of TROM digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Robin To David - (TROM Digest, Vol 154, Issue 4)
(The Resolution of Mind list)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 08:14:04 -0400
From: The Resolution of Mind list <[email protected]>
To: The Resolution of Mind list <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [TROM1] Robin To David - (TROM Digest, Vol 154, Issue 4)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi Robin,
Thank you for your reply and explanation.
The only thing I meant by Oahspe being of "data of comparable magnitude"
to scn is:
is that both are "bodies of knowledge", especially unique knowledge as
compared to everything else out there on earth.
I would even call Oashpe and scn polarities of "extreme knowledge".
I see them as extreme polarities of knowledge. Two polarities far from
each
other.
I read Oahspe several yrs before I got into scn.
And then referred back to Oashpe now and then, after I was doing scn.
Scn has the effect of totally pulling a person fully into itself, and
controlling one's mind and life. All encompassing. In effect a brain
washing. Scn is the largest or biggest, most mind controlling subject on
earth, especially if done in the church.
That is why it takes many yrs for escapies to decompress, if they ever
do.
It is bad enough for someone like me, who did scn on my own (outside the
church).
The benefit of the Oashspe is that it is a good and useful "far out"
polarity for me.
At least one of them (polarities) for me. I also have others.
There is a philosophical and psychological saying saying "Beware of the
one who has only read one book".
One can easily become an extreme zealot, an extreme fanatic, or simply
an
extremist: the most extreme example is an Islamic extremist.
And this idea of reading data of comparable magnitude, is one of the
things
I get from "How to study a science" in New Slant on Life.
In "how to study a science" Hubbard says to stop parroting him and learn
to
think for oneself, question and test everything (scrutinize everything).
Develop critical thinking methods.
And complete the cycle of learning.
The data that most stands out for me in Oashpe, or that I took away from
it
is "the virtues".
Another is the different levels of heavens (dimensions) and what goes on
there. Works like a government or administration departments for earth.
Another is the science and cosmology part.
And there are others.
I read it twice from cover to cover before I got into scn and referred
back
to it, countless times.
I think I may have even read much of it again,(to pull myself (my mind)
out of scn) some yrs after I got into scn (97).
My Oahspe book is highlighted to the extreme.
I categorize things like Oashpe and scn, high theta data.
Another good set of books (high theta data) to read, is the Anastasia
series of books by Vladimir Megre. ( 9 of them in hard copy).
www.ringingcedars.com
A recent one in pdf on line. I have not read this one yet.
David
_______________________________________________
TROM mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
