[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I gave  you a paradox.  What's the problom?
DAVEH:  What you gave me is not a paradox.
 Do you not consider it a paradox?
DAVEH:  I guess you need to define "" from your Protestant perspective.  There is simply nothing paradoxical about the that statement as I see it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Biblical paradox - The first shall be last.  The last shall be first.


DAVEH:  Do you really consider that to be a paradox, Glenn?  Do you not have an explanation (or several, for that matter) for that statement, except to consider it a paradox?


--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 

Reply via email to