[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I gave you a paradox. What's the problom?DAVEH: What you gave me is not a paradox.
Do you not consider it a paradox?DAVEH: I guess you need to define "" from your Protestant perspective. There is simply nothing paradoxical about the that statement as I see it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Biblical paradox - The first shall be last. The last shall be first.
DAVEH: Do you really consider that to be a paradox, Glenn? Do you not have an explanation (or several, for that matter) for that statement, except to consider it a paradox?
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~