<<By far, the most extensive
discussion of religion in Polanyi's writing comes in his final book
Meaning, written, as his health declined, with the help of the American
philosopher Harry Prosch. In this book, Polanyi tries to extend his
epistemological model to describe the nature of human knowledge found in art,
myth and religion. It is the kinship between metaphor, symbol, and ritual that
interests Polanyi and he uses his theory of tacit knowing to describe this
relationship and show the differences between ordinary perceptual and conceptual
knowledge and that found in the class of special artefacts available in art and
religion; he argues for the importance of human meaning in art, myth and
religion in the contemporary world.>> http://www.deepsight.org/articles/polanyi.htm
Hey Lance, What's
your view of Polanyi(?); e.g., interact with the
google-base link/excerpt, above, or interact with whatever Polanyi
moves you, with caution, though; there seems to be some expertise present,
so keep your commentary as clear as possible (like I
do:)
Gentleman ~ P
235 On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:00:47 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Re:Dictionary definition of obtuse [email] |
- [TruthTalk] Re:Nothing "obtuse here" Amen ttxpress
- [TruthTalk] Re:Nothing "obtuse here" Amen Lance Muir