Re: [TruthTalk] POLYANYI

[Wm. Taylor]

G,   I am tired of this conversation. I do not see how anything good can come from it. I would appreciate it if you would not respond to me any further. I will show the same courtesy to you.   Thank you,     Bill  ----- Original Message ----- From: Wm. Taylor To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:36 PM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] POLYANYI Polanyi doesn't teach subjectivity, G. That's the point. You would have to know him to know that. Why are you so upset? What's troubling you, really.   Bill Taylor ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:16 PM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] POLYANYI On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:05:37 -0700 "Wm. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [re: someone misunderstanding] "subjectivism" how so?   it's unfathomable where the misunderstanding could be, Bill, e.g.:   On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 .. "Wm. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >I find myself thanking you, David, for the encouraging words. They are much needed and appreciated...     well, what happened to them?   you made them suddenly disappear from this thread, then presented your view, essentially, that 'and' is a better word for you than 'but'   ..not even a Polanyi can't teach 'subjectivity' any better than that, can he?     G