jt
says > Let me try and get this straight. Bill are you
asking if it is OK to
add to or subtract from God's Word? I know you would not call it
that but I've
heard so much about wordsmithing in recent days - what's wrong
with calling
things what God has called them in His
Words?
Judy, What's wrong with waiting until I
have actually said what I wanted to say?
I very explicitly and nicely asked you to
please hold off judgment on this until I
had actually written
something. Why were you unwilling to do this?
jt: I did not see that it all
flowed together Bill and that this was the same as the
other. In fact, I have
a difficult time trying to figure out what you are saying
most of the time. Do you
consider asking a question the same as making
a
judgment? jt
Glad we can agree on something Bill - would you say
that language is part of our problem? bt:
Yes I would. I want to respond to the language part, but in a separate
post, one which takes into view some of the things others have been
saying. I wonder if we have been doing this all along and
this is why there is such confusion. bt: Perhaps, to some extent, I have been (in speaking only
for myself). But I would like to ask you to hold off judgment on this
one until I get a chance to share in greater detail later on. I'll
be exploring the question, Is there room in the professing church for a
convergence of sorts between God's spoken words and words spoken
about God, still his but expressed in fresh
language. Please be
patient,
Bill
----- Original
Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 8:03
PM
Subject: [TruthTalk] God in our
unconscious
jt: Let me try and get this straight. Bill
are you asking if it is OK to add to or
subtract from God's Word? I know you would
not call it that but I've heard
so much about wordsmithing in recent days -
what's wrong with calling
things what God has called them in His
Words?
Is there room in
the professing church for a convergence of sorts between
God's spoken
words and words spoken about God, still his but expressed in fresh
language.
John:
I
would say absolutely not. True understanding is the hopeless
victim of a church fragmented
by
thousands of years of bickering, killing, exclusions, and the like,
all in the name of
"truth."
What
are there -- 400 plus denominations? The fractured church
is the professing
church.
Thank God for grace and the eternal flow of the blood of
the Lamb.
jt: So long as God is still
God and the Holy Spirit has a ministry true understanding is
not
the victim of
anything. Our faith should not rest in Church history. Why do
you say that
God's grace and the blood
of the lamb are the answer to all the mess. Do you think
that
God will validate all
of the things you mention above anyway?
judyt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, now that that's settled I guess we
can get back to real fellowship.
Whose turn is it to bring the meat
loaf?