Judyt:'use/buttress'? Not intentionally, in my
opinion. 'subject to its precepts' As I 'read' you that is indeed so.
'sanctified conscience' No, I don't believe that I do understand so, please
explain.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: June 15, 2004 18:09
Subject: [TruthTalk] GW would fit right
in on TT
Lance, you still don't know what I'm about do
you? I don't use the Bible to buttress anything.
Actually I subject myself to it's precepts. Who
said anything about being born with an innate
sense of morality? I specifically said "a
sanctified conscience" Do you know what this means?
Judyt:Noah's wrong. We are not born with an
'innate sense of right and wrong". The conscience is socialized.
PS:Just once please don't right a totally
predictable response quoting all uses of conscience in the Bible to
buttress your personal opinion (read
tradition)
From the perspective of
"your doctrinal box" it may not be the same thing Lance. However, morality
and a sanctified conscience are one and the same;
Noah Webster's definition for Moral sense is "an innate or natural sense of
right and wrong; an instinctive perception of what is right or wrong in
moral conduct, which approves some actions and disapproves others,
independent of education or the knowledge of any positive rule or law.
jt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Judyt:Yes it does. Not the same
thing.
No problem with my sense
of smell at all Lance; you are wrong, being a believer has everything to
do with being moral.
"Know ye not that the unrighteous SHALL NOT
inherit the kingdom of God? e not deceived, neither fornicators, nor
idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with
mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor
extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God" (1 Corinthians 6:9).
Forget about the wisdom of your aquaintance, and the wisdom of the
movies. Go with what God Himself says and you can't go wrong.
Those who DO righteousness are the ones who are righteous (1 John 3:7)
jt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Judyt:That moral(ism) is of the devil. That's
what, Judy!! Wake up and smell the coffee, Judy. Being a believer and
moral(ism) have nothing to do with one another, Judy.
What does Chris get
Lance?
You and he appear to be in agreement with
regard to the President, (the man God's Word exhorts us to pray
for) and apparently neither of you have a problem with getting
heretical (3rd party) gossip from some slimy sources.
According to your doctrine these people have already been included in
the incarnation - so no worries - right?
Judyt:
Chris, in my opinion, 'gets it'!
If you're a moralist of the moralism camp
then, please know that God 'saves' such.
“The mood here is that we’re under siege, there’s no doubt about
it,” says one troubled aide who admits he is looking for work
elsewhere. “In this administration, you don’t have to wear a turban or
speak Farsi to be an enemy of the United States. All you have to do is
disagree with the President.”
Nice language ... moral man?
So? There are complainers in every
workplace - The language isn't his Chris Barr, it comes from your
source. Why do you keep such company? Reporters with
filthy mouths can take the liberty on forums such as this to "let it
all hang out" This has nothing whatsoever to do with the
morality of the President. Why entertain thoughts coming from
such as this?
Why is it called Capitol Hill Blue? Hell,
we don't know. We're sure we had a reason when we started this
thing back in 1994, but it's long since forgotten. Maybe it had
something do so with feeling blue after watching Congress at work.
Maybe it had something to do with the rampant
pornography called Congress or the fact
that we like publishing pictures of naked women from time to time or
writing about sex. Maybe it had something to do with...ah, what the hell, we don't know.
What are your politics? Politics? We don't need no
stinkin' politics. We're recovering newspapermen. A few also served
sentences on Capitol Hill. Experience in either, or both, of these
endeavors creates political agnostics.
|