Do you think that the law is sin ????????????????????????
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [TruthTalk] Tearing down?


> David Miller wrote:
> > I had asked in that post if Slade considered a widow
> > who had married another man to have a "renewed"
> > marriage contract or a new one.
>
> Slade wrote:
> > The logic is wrong here. We are the widow who are then
> > able to marry our True Husband. We are not divorced from
> > Torah of Moses to marry Messiah, we are divorced from
> > the "Torah of sin" (to quote D.Stern, I think) to marry Messiah.
>
> There are two questions involved here.  First, I was just asking whether
or
> not a widow who married again was considered to have a renewed or new
> marriage contract.  Can I assume that your answer here is that a widow who
> married again has a new marriage contract?
>
> The second question concerns the passage in Romans.  You say that we are
not
> divorced from "Torah of Moses" to marry Messiah, but rather we are
divorced
> from "Torah of sin."  Let's examine that, but first let me affirm that we
> are indeed to divorce from the Torah of sin, and to consider ourselves
dead
> to the Torah of sin, that we might be married to Messiah.  We agree on
that,
> but not on the Torah of Moses thing.  Look at the passage for yourself.
>
> Romans 7:3-13
> (3) So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man,
she
> shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free
from
> that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another
> man.
> (4) Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body
> of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised
> from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.
> (5) For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the
> law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death.
> (6) But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were
> held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of
> the letter.
> (7) What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not
known
> sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said,
Thou
> shalt not covet.
> (8) But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner
of
> concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead.
> (9) For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came,
sin
> revived, and I died.
> (10) And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto
> death.
> (11) For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it
> slew me.
> (12) Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and
> good.
> (13) Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin,
> that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that
> sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.
>
> Verse 3.  Clearly this is Torah of Moses.  The Torah of Moses is what
> prohibits adultery, but releases the woman to remarry in the case of
death.
> The Torah of sin does not prohibit adultery.  So verse 3 is speaking about
> the Torah of Moses.  Agreed?
>
> Verse 4. You believe that this verse is talking about Torah of sin while I
> believe it continues to talk about Torah of Moses.  Why do I believe that?
> Because of the previous and subsequent verses.
>
> Verse 5.  The motions of sin, which were by the law... which law?  The law
> of Moses, as he explains in verse 6 & 7.
>
> Verse 6.  Now we are delivered from the law... which law?  The law of
Moses,
> as he explains in verses 7 & 8.
>
> Verse 7.  Is the law sin?  Well, if we were talking about the law of sin,
> the answer would be yes, but no, we are talking about the law of Moses.
> Therefore, verses 4, 5, & 6 leading up to this verse clearly has the law
of
> Moses in view.  This is most abundantly clear by what follows next.  He
> actually quotes the law:  I had not know lust, except the law had said,
> 'Thou shalt not covet.'  Which law is this?  Clearly not the law of sin,
but
> the law of Moses.  What Paul is explaining here is an interaction between
> the law of Moses and the law of sin in our members.
>
> Verse 8.  Without the law, sin was dead.  Which law?  Again, it is the law
> of Moses.
>
> Look at verse 11:  sin taking occasion by the commandment... which
> commandment?  The commandment that comes from the law of Moses.
>
> I could go on and on, but surely you get the point.  The law Paul speaks
> about here is the law of Moses.  He specifically quotes a commandment of
> that law (thou shalt not covet).  More importantly, he is talking about a
> kind of relationship with the law, a covenant, whereby one seeks to be
> justified before God through observing the law of Moses.  I believe you
have
> used the word "legalism" to describe this covenant.  He clearly uses words
> like "dead to the law" and "delivered from the law" in speaking about the
> law of Moses.  This does not mean that Paul had something against the law
of
> Moses.  He clarifies this later, saying that the law is holy, just and
good.
> Rather, he is speaking about a kind of relationship to that law, a
covenant
> of law, which is now changed by the death of Christ.
>
> I'm going to stop here, because I wonder if we are going to be able to
> discuss this.  Let me know your thoughts thus far before we move forward.
>
> Peace be with you.
> David Miller.
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
>
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to