The
*naner-naner* needs to stop. As I stated in a previous
email...
I hear the tone behind the words better than David does. David sees the words used far better than I. When I tried to speak with others about the tone (even the implied tone), I got shot down. EVERY TIME.
Simply stated, it's clear that JD "feels" what I felt
in JudyT's post. From my understanding, JD is attempting to show JudyT
where the tone can be perceived as mean or insulting. As it now stands, JD
is not viewed as "stirring the pot" unless overturned by the Owner of the
forum.
--slade
-----Original Message-----
From: Judy Taylor
Sent: Sunday, 16 January, 2005 14.27
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Private InterpretationYou are "stirring the pot" here John, that just didn't need to be said..On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:26:17 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:jt: Possibly because you appear to be focused in/on tradition right now and I study God's Word
(just a guess on my part)
Possibly an insult. (just a guess on my part).
JD, why must you keep stirring the pot of strife (as if there isnât enough already.)Let Slade determine for himself if he is insulted. Izzy
It is funny that you think I am the one who stirrs the pot when it was Judy who made the statement. LOL
Jd
