Re: [TruthTalk] Good News!

[Jeff Powers]

Lance, for the record, I agree with you here!  It's unfortunate that David 
M.(and a few others) is blind to the simple realities of this list.
Jeff

Life makes warriors of us all.
To emerge the victors, we must arm
ourselves with the most potent of weapons.
That weapon is prayer.
--Rebbe Nachman of Breslov
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 14:36
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Good News!


Sectarianism DOES INDEED EXIST ON TT!! Please, someone correct either 
myself
or David on this. Further, Linda does indeed say what amounts to, "I am of
David". (Linda, please illustrate for us with what frequency you 'amen'
David (WOW that was an awesome post, David!) Sorry David, but ya gots at
least one disciple.

Private interpretation DOES INDEED EXIST ON TT!! Please, someone correct
either myself or David on this. Further on this, David, are we reading the
same forum? Who among us says: "What I'm about to say that differs with 
what
you say has no biblical foundation whatsoever, as I interpret Scripture."

Am I incorrect in identifying you, Judy and Linda as having a dislike, if
not disdain, for 'tradition'? What, as y'all see it, replaces this
(tradition) is your (correct) interpretation of Scripture.By 'private' I'd
include those who both know what you mean and agree with your
interpretation.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>
Sent: January 17, 2005 12:47
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Good News!


Lance wrote:
> David, we are! 'The good news of the gospel
> of Jesus' Is it not sectarianism that is being
> addressed in this passage? Some say 'I am of
> David(that would be Linda), others say 'I am
> of Judy' and so on. Indeed, David, sectarianism
> does and must exist on TT. Even DaveH speaks
> of 'the good news of the gospel of Jesus' does he
> not? Surely there is no final standard by which we
> determine who is right? Private interpretation, as I
> read you, is the final arbiter.This would put DaveH
> on equal footing with David Miller. This is so is it not?
No, it is not so.  Paul was rebuking sectarianism.  We should not have
anyone here saying, "I am of David" (I do NOT believe this is Linda) nor
others saying, "I am of Judy" (who says this?).  We should all be seeking
to
be conformed to the image of Christ.  The final arbiter of truth is Jesus
Christ.  Private interpretation of Scripture is NOT ALLOWED.  The reason
we
discuss with one another is to circumvent private interpretation.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a 
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.