In a message dated 1/18/2005 4:06:55 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To call that ad hominem is straining at gnats IMO. She did not call him any ugly names. She is criticizing a theology not a person. Izzy (Since you asked.)
So, if I said that her theology was thoughtless, without practical consequence and stupid, that would not be ad hominem? Tha leaves open a whole host of negatives. Awesome. This squeal without the pig thingy may work after all -- that is if you don't give a care about the person you criticize.
John
- RE: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does sham... Knpraise
- RE: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does... ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does... Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does... Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does... Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does... Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does... Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does... Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does... ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does... ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does... ttxpress