Yes,
and the words we use are names for the concepts not the reality. But the same
person designed both our minds and the rest of reality, and so systems
of concepts are related to the reality in a nonrandom way that lets us
live (with varying degrees of success). Hence there are degrees of
shared concept, too, although no two thinkers even using the "same"
symbolic system have identical concepts (nor identical experiences of
reality). The more similar the concepts are, though, the more we are prone
to assume they are the reality. Isolation of groups produces
groupthink.
My
questions arising have to do with learning: How does one know how great the
variance is between one's concept and the reality, or which of two concepts is
"closer", especially if it's an abstract reality? How does one change one's
concepts in that case, if they're all one has by which to
think?
Debbie
|
- RE: [TruthTalk] concept-reality Q Debbie Sawczak
- RE: [TruthTalk] concept-reality Q Charles Perry Locke
- RE: [TruthTalk] concept-reality Q Debbie Sawczak
- RE: [TruthTalk] concept-reality Q Charles Perry Locke
- RE: [TruthTalk] concept-reality Q Debbie Sawczak
- RE: [TruthTalk] concept-reality Q Debbie Sawczak
- Re: [TruthTalk] concept-reality ... Terry Clifton
- RE: [TruthTalk] concept-reality Q Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Revelation David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] concept-reality Q Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] concept-reality Q Knpraise