Izzy writes:
If Original Sin means that we are
born guilty and deserving of hell then Jesus was born guilty by His human
nature, and could never have been the Sinless Lamb of God who died for our
sins.
jt: I'm not exactly sure what the
term "Original Sin" means Izzy. I find most of what the Church Fathers
wrote to be contradictory and quite confusing and this is where
the concept of the "Eternal Son" and that of "Original
Sin" originate.
Your point about Jesus being "the sinless
Lamb of God" is excellent and He could never have been that if he was born with
a human nature (exactly like ours) generated by natural procreation through
the first Adam. In fact if this is how he was then why a virgin
birth? What was the point? Mary and Joseph might just as well have
had him by natural procreation and God could have claimed him as holy since
he was the first male to open the womb and anointed Him with the fullness of the
Spirit - right?
No there is a reason for the "virgin
birth" and it has to do with Jesus' humanity. My own belief is that because the "iniquities of the fathers"
are a generational (spiritual) rather than a genealogical (natural) inheritance
is why the virgin birth was necessary. If Jesus had Joseph
for a natural father he would have been born in that families sin with
Joseph's generational iniquity (or curses). However, since God was
His father and He chose life overcoming in the three areas where
A&E were tempted and Adam fell, He was able to submit to the
cross as a "sinless Lamb" and it was at
Calvary that He became a sacrifice to pay the price for my sin and yours along
with the sin of the world.
Grace and Peace,
Judy
|
- Re: [TruthTalk] Jesus Nature Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Jesus Nature David Miller