You try to paint Fundamentalists EX Cathedra again. Lance Speaks & it was so.
Since you have nothing of consequence to show that Fundamentalists are X or Y; you make assertions toss the mud and hope it sticks. --- Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > He would not and, has said so. He is, however, quite incorrect. He's > just a 'fundy' with a vocabulary and good grammar. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Kevin Deegan > To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org > Sent: February 25, 2005 12:49 > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Barth > > > I am a "Fundie" with a Capital F > I would dare say David would not classify himself as such > > Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sadly, it just such prattle that permits the rest of us to see > you, Kevin, and David for who you really are...that would be > illiterate 'fundies' of the first order. However, your respective > 'fundy' hearts would appear to be motivated to share Christ on a > regular basis with others. God is gracious!! > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Kevin Deegan > To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org > Sent: February 25, 2005 10:57 > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Barth > > > This is the best and clearest example of why & how Barfh is a > Christian? > Did he apply this to himself? Did he take Jesus as his personal > savior? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The event of the death of Christ is the execution of the > judgment of God, of the gracious God who in the giving of His son in > our place, and the lowly obedience of the Son in our place, > reconciled the world with Himself, genuinely and definitely affirmed > man as His creature in spite of his sin, cried to the heaven, > confirmed His faithfulness towards him, and carried through His > covenant with him............... Barth (Church Dogmatics, iv.1, p > 514) > > Words written by one who is involved in the very story for > which Christ experienced. > > > > > > > In a message dated 2/25/2005 6:16:43 AM Pacific Standard > Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > It is interesting to me that God dealt with the fall of man > as He did. His was a solution considered in a world (eternity) very > different from ours -- inaccessible, in fact, except through faith > (now) and dying (later). But the administration of this > "consideration" was in our world -- a world that God created, > rules over but cannot indwell apart from a humiliation (Philip 2) > and a surrender of his eternal existence in death. That is a > remarkable action on the part of the Christian God. I believe that > what He did for us is what He HAD to do. The fall left Him without > a choice. And He knew of this demand before our creation. The Son > of God was just that, the Son, before the foundations of the world > (John 17) and it was out of this passion that we are created!! > > The "creation," then, was not a statement of His power so > much as it was of His grace. > > (These words are mine ---------- the inspiration, such > as it is, for these words came from Barth. To argue that Barth is > not profoundly a Christian is ill-informed, at best) > > JD > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
