Why don't you show it to St. Peter at the Pearly Gates, and see what that
gets you, Lance? Izzy

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 12:12 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Legalism

When I wish to illustrate legalism, I show them posts like this.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>
Sent: April 02, 2005 11:55
Subject: [TruthTalk] Legalism


> *Note Subject Change
> was "Eternal Judgment" and now is "Legalism"
>
> John defined legalism as:
> > It is the imposition of their interpretations upon others
> > and the elevation of their understanding to the status
> > of Ex-Cathedra.
>
> This is pretty much how I see you coming across all the time, John.
> However, the rest of what you described applies very little to me, you, or
> almost anybody else I know.  There have been a few over the years, but I
> don't tend to hang around people like that too long.
>
> I use the term legalism in the way that the dictionary defines it, which
is
> adherence to the letter of law, or a literal interpretation and adherence
to
> some law, rule, or religious code.  You guys have a certain theological
> system passed on to you from guys like Torrance and Wright, and you are
very
> strict not to depart from it.  It is actually your new found legalism that
> makes it difficult interacting with those who are legalistic in regards to
> the standards of Scripture.  Like Bill said, however, most legalists do
not
> realize that they are legalists.  We are creatures of habit and tradition,
> and this is what makes us all tend to be legalistic in some way.
>
> I keep in mind that passage that says that the letter of the law kills but
> the spirit gives life.  This tempers my tendency to be legalistic.  I
think
> the absence of legalism would be sin, but I also think over emphasizing
the
> letter can be a sin as well.  Remember that Jesus encouraged his disciples
> to listen and learn from the legalists of his day, but he warned them of
> their hypocrisy.  He wanted us to do what the legalists said to do, but
not
> to follow their example of living.
>
> Too many times in this culture we hear warnings against legalism.  This is
> kind of like the hippy cry of the 1960's for freedom and liberty and free
> love.  Too often the battle cry against legalism is a justification for
> anti-authoritarianism and anti-Biblical adherence.  How about we talk
about
> this word legalism some more and see if we can decide if it is really all
> that bad after all.
>
> As a starter for discussion, if legalism were carte blanche evil, then
> shouldn't we just get rid of all laws?  It seems to me that without laws
and
> rules, then it would be very difficult for anyone to be legalistic.  What
do
> you think?
>
> Peace be with you.
> David Miller.
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to