Don't want to be a tattle tale but, did you know that the guy who wrote this post and the one who responded both have some of the writings of Karl Barth. Do you think that might account for them thinking that they, along with the 'K-man' himself, know more than Paul? That's not as bad, mind you as Karl, whom you thought lorded it over the Lord Himself.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: April 05, 2005 14:58
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Legalism

 
 
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:47:42 -0600 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John, this is really good. I don't know if I would call confession, prayer, and repentance "substitutes" for sacrificial offering, but I certainly understand what you are attempting to convey. I notice something in your use of Heb 10.14 that may even strengthen your case. The word for "He has perfected" (teteleioken) is a perfect active indicative 3rd person singular, a verb which describes a completed aspect*; but the word for "those who are sanctified" (hagiazomenous) is a present passive participle, the voice of which is not reflected in the translation you are using. Hence this verse should probably read something like "by one offering he has perfected forever those who are being sanctified." Now think of this: the "forgiveness" of verse 18 is as definite and complete as the "one offering" of verse 14 (as you have stated -- thus the cessation of sacrificial offerings), and this because that one offering is Jesus Christ, he who has perfected forever those who are in the process of being sanctified.
 
I wonder if Paul knew about these Gk verbs.... they could have saved him a lot of grief.
 
Here's the point, John (and I know you agree with this), forgiveness does not ebb and flow depending upon where we are in the process of sanctification. Prayer, confession, and repentance, while important, speak not to whether we are forgiven, but rather to the quality and beauty of our relationship with the Father, through the Son, in the Holy Spirit; your words speak to fellowship, in other words, and not to justification.
 
What if you are out there in fornication does sin no longer cause a relationship problems with the Father o we no longer need clean hands and a pure heart to ascend His holy hill?
 
Moreover, sanctification, while yet unfinished, is also as definite as the one offering of Christ Jesus, and this because in him we have been perfected (and I read this as much more than a legal imputation or declaration; i.e., even though there is an already-but-not-yet at play here, it is nonetheless an ontological fact: in Christ we have been perfected). And because we are in Christ -- and this is the exciting part: -- our sanctification is as if it were perfected; said another way, its end is as definite and absolute as it would be if it were finished even as we speak.
 
Then none of this involves faith?  How sad Paul didn't know about it.  Can you imagine that Paul actually believed  that he could be a "castaway" himself if he didn't keep his body under - after preaching to other ppl?" (1 Cor 9:27) also that Paul taught ppl to "Mortify their members and put off some things?" (Col 3:5)
 
And so, the passive voice of the participial phrase "those who are being sanctified" is therefore crucial in our understanding of this: we participate or fellowship in our sanctification, but we do not produce it; we are being sanctified by a sovereign act of God. He is the active agent; hence its outcome is certain. Paul says it like this: "For I am confident of this very thing, that he who began [this] good work in you will perfect it until the day of Christ Jesus" (Phi 1.6). We will be sanctified, and this is for sure, because it is God who sanctifies us.
 
So 1 Cor 9:27 is a mistake?  What about Romans 8:13 "If you live after the flesh you will die?" and Romans 6:17,18 where Paul talks about obeying from the heart and becoming servants of righteousness,
You say Fellowship is where it's at - huh!!
 
Now, does that produce hope and assurance, or what?
 
I had hope anyway which rests in the truth of God's Word (in English).  Greek verbs do nothing for me.
I do understand that we have been saved, are being saved (sanctification), and will be saved but your
certainty seems a bit premature to me. If it were that certain there would be no warnings in scripture and
there are plenty of them.
 
Bill
 
* In Greek grammar, "aspect" indicates what type of action a verb describes. A verb which occurs in the "perfect aspect" indicates an action that was brought to its full completion but has effects carrying on into the present (See Mounce, 119-120). If I need to explain further I will (not that you will need it, but maybe others will).
________________________________________________________________________________________  
 
John writes   >   In Hebrews 10.16ff, there is a presumption by Divine revelation  --   that sin is only forgiven in the offering of sacrifice.  We do not catch the importance of this fact.   ONLY IN THE OFFERING OF A SACRIFICE IS THERE TO BE FORGIVENESS.   That is why sacrifice has been with us from the beginning, post-garden.    When Jeremiah predicts that "....I will remember their sins no more,"  he was, in fact, speaking of the sacrifice that was offered once and for all time:   "For by one offering He has perfected for all time those who are sanctified"  (10:14).   Confession does not secure forgiveness.  Prayer does not.   Repentance does not   ---------------   these are presented to us in scripture as substitutes for sacrificial offering.   "Now where there is forgiveness of these things  (full and completed), there is no longer any offering for us"  (10:18).
 

Reply via email to