Regarding the below...yes, their relationship with Jesus
(which, Izzy, involves his "indwelling presence"), shared as members of a
community.
The original point, if I recall the distant beginning of this
thread correctly, is not that we have less than Scripture, but that we
have more than Scripture: we have Scripture and we have a vital
relationship with Christ, who lives in us by his Spirit. Do we arrive at the
relationship with Christ by the act of reading the Bible, or is it the
relationship/indwelling that empowers and illuminates the Bible to us? The Word
is before the word.
We've talked about oral tradition elsewhere in this thread;
the Good News was no doubt being repeated over and over in those
earliest days of the church, and part of the ministry and inspiration
of the Holy Spirit was some believers correcting other believers,
whether orally or in writing. God did not need people to "decide" which
writings (or utterances) were inspired in order for those writings/utterances to
have power and be used by the Spirit through the relationship people had with
Christ. (In fact, that will have been part of the set of criteria used
to identify the canon.) In any case, the decisions that established the
canon (whether OT or NT), in the absence of one, must have been
themselves inspired as the result of a relationship; that's part of what we are
saying when we say we believe the Bible, is it not? Now that we have the canon,
the Spirit still enlivens the Scripture to our hearts in the same way
he did before the decision--and graciously makes use of all our faculties in
doing so.
Am I making any sense to
anybody?
Debbie
The Old Testament scriptures were accessed by the
Jews. They were Jewish scripture, Linda, not Gentile
scriptures. You would not find a Gentile Christian walking around the
countryside with the "Bible" under arm in those early
years. I made it clear that I was speaking of the
Gentile Church and I will add - the Gentile Church of the first century
and early second century -- after the fall of Jerusalem and it's
associated impact on the Early Church. And, the "Bible" is a
specific book containing N.T. scriptures ............... what did
these folks do until the books of the "Bible" were decided upon by the
Church? Relationship !!! Their relationship with
Jesus. I am not fostering some false teaching here.
If you don't believe in a "relationship" with Jesus that is something other than
Bible study, then we do have a disagreement. My reading of
your posts show a "relatioship" that is valued (by you) and as distinct a
circumstance as prayer or fellowship or the breaking of bread.
Jd
|
- [TruthTalk] Bible vs "Community" Debbie Sawczak
- [TruthTalk] Bible vs "Community" ShieldsFamily
- Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Re [Truth Talk] Saved -... Terry Clifton
- Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Re [Truth Talk] Saved -... Judy Taylor
- Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Re [Truth Talk] Saved... Kevin Deegan
- Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Re [Truth Talk] Saved... Dave Hansen
- [TruthTalk] Humility David Miller
- Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] Humility Lance Muir
- Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Re [Truth Talk] Saved -... ttxpress
- Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Re [Truth Talk] Saved -... ttxpress