Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1

Tue, 10 May 2005 21:18:33 -0700

I know you really go for irrational upper crust man centered hi brow religion.
Facts don't do it.

Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry but, rationalistic evidentialism just doesn't do it for me.You would, IMO, get a resounding amen from David.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: May 09, 2005 16:49
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1

NO EVIDENCE?
There were at least 500 EYEWITNESSES to the ressurected savoir!
500 eyewitnesses is enough to convict anyone in a court of LAW even in CanaDAH!
 
How do you know Booth shot Lincoln? Irrefutable?
How do you know any historical figure really existed?

Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is NO EVIDENCE (irrefutable utilizing David Miller's brand of logic) that Jesus is real - none, zip, zero, notta. If you (or anyone) has placed their faith in the evidence then, be prepared for a fall. 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: May 09, 2005 08:24
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1

Caroline Wong wrote:
I consider myself Christian. There are tons of definitions of Evangelical. The simplest is a person who belongs to an Evangelical denomination. I define it as a person who tells another the good news.
 
BTW, was it you who said that if someone proved to you Jesus was false, you would stop believing? (I think it was in relation to the LDS people and Joseph Smith) I was completely stunned by that post and not sure if I read it right.
 
Love,
 
Caroline
================================================================
If you had absolute proof that Jesus was not the Savior, you would be out of your mind to continue to believe.  I am a realist.  I have examined the evidence.  Jesus is real!!!
Terry

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!

Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour

Reply via email to