Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH

[Lance Muir]

Two issues arise:   1. Which 'heretical doctrines' arise from 'them'? 2. IFF some actually do then, are they offset by those 'heretical doctrines' arising from the 'accepted canon'. Example:The 'rapture' doctrine from 1 Thess. ----- Original Message ----- From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 07, 2005 07:43 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH And the RCC adopted them as “canon” to support their heretical doctrines. Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:16 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH   JD reaches back into his dusty old shelf of misinformation. The Apocrypha was part of the corrupt mss The apocrypha was not part of the 1611 it was printed as a tool like the maps we have in our bibles, not interspesed as part of the text as in the Oldest & best manuscripts The apocryphal books were not in the Jewish OT either only in the RC bibles. The minister of questions chooses to mislead. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.greatsite.com/timeline-english-bible-history/   You may find this interesting.   As far as "adding" to the bible  -- did you know that the Apocrapha was a part of nearly all Bibles until the mid to late 1800's.   The so-called "Prostestant bible" is a little over 120 yers old.  Christ and or the New Testament writers quoted from most of them, themselves.     Jd   -----Original Message----- From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:10:53 -0400 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH What were the more noble Bereans of Acts 17:11 checking Paul's teaching against?  Also your favorite epistle James is said to have been written by the Lord's brother only 15yrs following the ascension.  Could we be missing something here JD?   On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:03:19 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When did the Bible come into existence  --  before or after the Revelation?   There was no book called the "Bible" in first century times.   But, certainly, we should not be adding to what God has said. Jd From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Myth - It is finished already And this warning is not only in Revelation, it is also in Deuteronomy and in Proverbs.   On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In 'Prophecy: The Uprising' they go on to FINISH the book of Revelations. From: ShieldsFamily You are wrong again, Blaine.  Revelations says that no one is to add or subtract from the Bible.  Did you miss that part? Izzy     __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com