I do not think you believe or preach anything that would affect your salvation, or anyone else's.
   
I thought you were saying that my thinking or teaching is of no consequence  to anyone   .........................  The way you got to that (apparently, on my part) magined point was rather clever.   Anyway  --- it struct me as funny. 
 
Jd
 
 
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:29:27 -0500
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

I am also a confused guy.  I am glad you had a good laugh but there was no dig and no humor intended.  What was so funny?
Terry

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
I absolutely love a good well placed dig.    That last phrase is a gem.   I am laughing so hard I can barely type.   You are good guy, Mr Terry.    
 
JD
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:17:04 -0500
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are probably getting too technical.   The "incarnation story"  means the whole picture -- to me.  I understand the "gospel"  to be the death,burial and resurrection, which, when fully understood, is the "good news."   At any event  -- I do not think any of this qualifies me as a humanist or someone whose doctrine is to be feared and/or opposed  .......................   right???
 
JD
I do not have the faintest idea what a humanist might be.  Having made that clear,  though we often see things a little differently, I do not think you believe or preach anything that would affect your salvation, or anyone else's.
Terry
 


Reply via email to