Okay and thanks JD. Would you say that the entire Bible is
the Word of God, or the Bible is partly The Word of God and partly
man's opinion or something else? iz
PS I believe that all truth is from God. Even
2+2=4.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 5:05 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The TEXT will never be uniformily apprehended!!!
No. 2 plus 2 = 4 is truth but not the Word of God
truth. Secondly, "truth" as you use it is probably
conceptual in nature where as "Word of God" as I understand
the term is an aspect of God as seen in Christ AND the several avenues of
self-revelation that are His. -------- including but not
limited to the biblical message
JD
-----Original Message-----
From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:38:04 -0500
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The TEXT will never be uniformily apprehended!!!
Sorry, it was inadvertent. They are one and the same to
me. Aren't they to you? iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 8:06 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The TEXT will never be uniformily apprehended!!!
I am talking about "Word of God." You are talking about
"truth." Why the disconnect.
JD
-----Original Message-----
From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:33:57 -0500
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The TEXT will never be uniformily apprehended!!!
FTR, JD, I have exactly the
same reaction when you make that statement. How do you figure which parts
"contain" truth and which ones don't? iz
You use inductive reasoning and that effected
what when I said "The Bible contains the Word of God?"
