As usual, instead of responding to my comments like a Christian,
you go for the jugular. You have proved my point.
iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:34 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]Billy T -- call me
Much easier to run the old mouth than come up with real answers to real
questions, isn't it , Linda??
You don't have a definition for
"inspiration," yet you write as
if you do. You haven't a clue as to the actual use of the word
"liberal," yet you persist in using
this word -- ignorance be damned. You speak of "shifting sands" yet you have not a single example of such in either my life or Bill Taylor's or
Bishop Muir's. And you pretend
to know something of the joy and peace that I have received as a result of the
changes in my life over the course of this past year.
So much for your sense of moral superiority.
Jd
-----Original Message-----
From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:32:04 -0600
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]Billy T -- call me
Yes, call Bill so he
can help you fortify this liberal line of
theology. "The Bible is culture-based and "inspired" in places, but not
"Gods written Word." Everything liberal is a variation upon this theme.
It is so very predictable. But it leaves you with no firm foundation;
only shifting sand. How much joy and peace has living this belief brought
you, JD? Bill? Lance? I'd be
interested to know. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 9:44 PM
To:TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]Billy T -- call me
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 9:44 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]Billy T -- call me
Hey Bill - call
me.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Sent: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:17:10 -0500
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What counsel would you offer?
Why wasn't King David told to
dump Bathsheba? Do we not see that the
rules of marriage were developed out of cultural
considerations? And who said that the "commandments" in
I Co 7:19 are the 613 of the old law? He just got through saying
that circumcision is
nothing one way or the other !!! Yet it is commanded under The
Law. Why do we resist the obvious -- that Paul is
dealing with various issues previously questioned
(7:1) with his answers being drawn from either a point of wisdom or as a
consideration of the revelation of Christ as he was being
prepared for the [Gentile] ministry.
The very fact that there are a
number of difficult issues surrounding marriage is evidence of the fact that the
New Testament scriptures were never to be considered as a legal document to any
degree whatsoever. Not a word about a father who sexually abuses his
children. Nothing about physical abuse. If fornication is intercourse and
"sexual immorality" is everything else, then only intercourse outside the
marriage is prohibited as an action for divorce. Is a wife
stuck with her husband if he will not work, but supports the family through
thievery. What if he is basically
absent from the home, ala outside sales, but visits the home several times
a year ........................ leaving the wife with all the home responsibilities but none of the joy
of being married.
Jd
-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Clifton <wabbits1234@earthlink.net>
To:
Sent: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:23:55 -0600
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What counsel would you offer?
Circumcision may be
nothing Christine.You can only do it once.
Adultery on the other hand , can be, and in this case is, continual sin. Those
who live in continual sin when they know that it is wrong are not following
Christ; they are living in rebellion to His command. There is no forgiveness
unless they turn from their sin to Christ. There are no new creatures with old
natures. I know that sounds harsh, and I wish I could find a loophole. I had to
break fellowship with a brother I love over this same
situation.
Terry
>
> >
>>[Original Message]
>>From: Christine Miller <verilysaid@yahoo.com>
>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] org>
>>Date: 11/6/2005 1:13:28 PM
>>Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What counsel would you offer?
>>
>>I was reading 1 Corinthians 7, not particularly
>>thinking of this topic, but I read this about
>>circumcision:
>>
>>1 Cor. 7:18 - Is any man called being circumcised? let
>>him not become uncircumcised. Is any called in
>>uncircumcision? Let him not be circumcised.
>>
>>And then verse 19 says how circumsision is nothing,
>>and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the
>>commandments. I was wondering: does this verse apply
&g t;>to this situation at all? If the two were unsaved when
>>they were divorced and then remarried, and then get
>>saved while in this second relationship, it doesn't
>>sound right to divorce again, just as someone
>>circumsised should not be uncircumsised after coming
>>to Christ. Why not accept forgiveness and begin to
>>walk afresh?
>>
>>And I have a question: does King David's example apply
>>to this situation? Or was that different? >>
>>What do you all think? This is a difficult issue.
>>
>>
>>Blessings!
>>
>>
>> >>
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how y ou ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Terry
>
> >
>>[Original Message]
>>From: Christine Miller <verilysaid@yahoo.com>
>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] org>
>>Date: 11/6/2005 1:13:28 PM
>>Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What counsel would you offer?
>>
>>I was reading 1 Corinthians 7, not particularly
>>thinking of this topic, but I read this about
>>circumcision:
>>
>>1 Cor. 7:18 - Is any man called being circumcised? let
>>him not become uncircumcised. Is any called in
>>uncircumcision? Let him not be circumcised.
>>
>>And then verse 19 says how circumsision is nothing,
>>and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the
>>commandments. I was wondering: does this verse apply
&g t;>to this situation at all? If the two were unsaved when
>>they were divorced and then remarried, and then get
>>saved while in this second relationship, it doesn't
>>sound right to divorce again, just as someone
>>circumsised should not be uncircumsised after coming
>>to Christ. Why not accept forgiveness and begin to
>>walk afresh?
>>
>>And I have a question: does King David's example apply
>>to this situation? Or was that different? >>
>>What do you all think? This is a difficult issue.
>>
>>
>>Blessings!
>>
>>
>> >>
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how y ou ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
