cd: Not I.

> [Original Message]
> From: Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>
> Date: 11/8/2005 9:30:54 AM
> Subject: [TruthTalk] Dave thinks if you are not a catholic or mormon you
are a "protestant".
>
> Dave,
>
>    If you are interested only in what protestants think, then perhaps you 
> are on the wrong forum. WILL EVERYONE ON THE FORUM WHO CONSIDERS ONESELF
A 
> "PROTESTANT" PLEASE TELL DAVE SO HE CAN DIRECT HIS QUESTIONS AT YOU?
While 
> the fellowships I attend may have stemmed from the protestant movement, I
do 
> not consider myself a "protestant", per se, even though I share some
beliefs 
> that protestants have...but I consider myself a member of the Body of 
> Christ, the "church universal". It transcends all man-made denominations
and 
> sects and relies on scripture and not any particular tradition.
>
> Perry
>
> >From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
> >To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
> >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry & Dave: inquiring minds want to know
> >Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:59:27 -0800
> >
> >* Landmark Baptists believe they pre-date the Roman Catholic Church.*
> >
> >DAVEH:   Thank you for lending a little more insight, Perry. 
FWIW........
> >
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landmark_Baptist_Church
> >
> >.........WIKI has a little to say about it that clarifies what I think 
> >Kevin has been implying.  It seems.........
> >
> >/The leaders of what would become known as the Landmark movement were
James 
> >Robinson Graves, James Madison Pendleton, and Amos Cooper Dayton
(sometimes 
> >called the Great Triumvirate)./
> >
> >..........lived in the mid 19th Century and fostered the notion that 
> >organization had its inception at the time of Jesus.  Do you believe
that 
> >as they do, Perry?  Or...do you believe they were founded by the /Great 
> >Triumvirate/?
> >
> >    As you know, Perry.....my interest is in the Protestants.  So, those 
> >Baptists who lay claim to Protestant roots are those who I tend to cast
my 
> >focus.  That there are small congregations or individuals who claim not
to 
> >be Protestant don't capture my attention at this point.  But....If there 
> >are Baptists who are rooted in Protestantism....that's what I am curious 
> >about.  So....that Kevin (or you) are referring to small groups who are
not 
> >associated with Protestantism is really not pertinent to my interests.
> >
> >Charles Perry Locke wrote:
> >
> >>Dave, do you consider the Wikipedia to be a reliable source of truth?
Who 
> >>wrote the article? Who are these "Christian church historians". Why is
the 
> >>word "protestant" in quotes? This article has no credits and no
citations. 
> >>Why should it carry any weight other than the fact that it mentions a
few 
> >>points you are trying to make?
> >>
> >>But, if you prefer Wikipedia for your source of truth, then perhaps you 
> >>should have read on...
> >>
> >>"The name Protestant is rejected by some Baptists because Baptists do
not 
> >>have a direct connection to Luther, Calvin or the Roman Catholic
Church. 
> >>They do not feel that they are protesting anything and* Landmark
Baptists 
> >>believe they pre-date the Roman Catholic Church.* Other Baptists accept 
> >>the Protestant label as a demographic concept that describes churches
who 
> >>share similar theologies of sola scriptura, sola fide, the priesthood
of 
> >>all believers and other positions that Luther, Calvin and traditional 
> >>reformers held in contrast to the Roman Catholic Church in the 1500s."
> >>
> >>Notice that first line?
> >>
> >>On the other hand, I prefer the term "Christian" to any other 
> >>labels...those who are members of the Body of Christ, regardless of
from 
> >>which tradition they come, what "denomination" of fellowship they
attend, 
> >>and who get their truth from the Word of God. This may also include 
> >>personal revelation that is in line with Biblical truths and
principles. 
> >>So, relying on heretical extra-biblical works produced by or through a 
> >>magic talisman bearing peep-stone treasure hunter disqualifies one from 
> >>the Body of Christ.
> >>
> >>Perry
> >>
> >>
> >>>From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
> >>>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
> >>>Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry & Dave: inquiring minds want to know
> >>>Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:45:56 -0800
> >>>
> >>>DAVEH:  Did you not read the WIKI definition I previously provided, 
> >>>Kevin?  DavidM has subsequently provided this one, also from
WIKI........
> >>>
> >>>/The word Anabaptism may be used to describe a "*Protestant*" group 
> >>>baptizing Christians who were baptized in infancy and/or who come to
them 
> >>>from other bodies, any of the 16th century "radical" dissenters, or
the 
> >>>denominations descending from the followers of Menno Simons. The use
of 
> >>>the term Anabaptism does not necessarily imply claims to uniformity 
> >>>between the groups thus denominated. Today the descendants of the 16th 
> >>>century European movement (particularly the Amish, Hutterites, & 
> >>>Mennonites) are the most common bodies referred to as Anabaptist. Yet 
> >>>other bodies (such as the early English Baptists) were also referred
to 
> >>>by their enemies as Anabaptists, and are clearly Anabaptists in the 
> >>>generally accepted sense of the term. The majority of Baptists further 
> >>>engage in a practice others consider "rebaptizing" in that they
usually 
> >>>rebaptize even adult believers who were baptized by some mode other
than 
> >>>immersion. _Christian church historians generally believe that there
is 
> >>>no historical continuity between anabaptists in the first few
centuries 
> >>>of the Christianity and later anabaptist groups._/
> >>>
> >>>..........Does that not explain the situation?  Modern day Baptists
are 
> >>>Protestants.
> >>
> >
> >--
> >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >Dave Hansen
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >http://www.langlitz.com
> >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >If you wish to receive
> >things I find interesting,
> >I maintain six email lists...
> >JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
> >STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
> >
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to