What I have done is to ask a series of questions asfter answering all that was given to me. Will you answer the single question I have asked of you, Dean, AND those that I have asked of Mr Deegan?
Jd
-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 12:38:44 -0500
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor - TT'ers
cd: Then explain Romans 8:1 and Luke 4:4 and their respective missing scripture to me? What is you take on this? Have you looked into this phenomenon?
----- Original Message -----Sent: 11/20/2005 12:21:58 PMSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor - TT'ers"That guy" did not "repent" of anything. Just a silly rumor. NASV is based upon a greek text that is older than the Church controlled Byzantine text of the 1500's. There is nothing sinister or worthy of "repentance" in the translating of the NASV. The fact that no one is going to answer the questions I asked of deegan is evidence to me of the weakness of your argument. Dean , you use the KJ translation to defeat the NASV while completely missing the point of the various translations and assuming the very thing that is in question ------------- the supremacy of the KJ bible.Jd
-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Moore <cd_moore@earthlink.net>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 07:57:03 -0500
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor - TT'ers
----- Original Message -----From: Judy TaylorTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: 11/20/2005 7:21:16 AMSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor - TT'ersOn Sun, 20 Nov 2005 06:56:04 -0500 "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:cd: I don't believe we have to go to that extreme:-) As we do not hold to the versions that do this-also there is a difference between the degree of altercations in the NASV and the Book of Mormon-huge difference. One left off words or made mistakes while the other was turned into a complete new religion by Smith.I hear what you are saying Dean - ATST it is hypocritical to castigate them while doing the same thing ourselves in the name of scholarship. I read somewhere that one of the NASB translators had a change of heart and repented for the part he played in that translation. The NIV which is used in most churches today is one of the worst offenders. Cutting the second part of Romans 8:1 out is a real travesty that leads ppl to believe that all they must do to be free from condemnation is to say their prayer. Never mind walking after the Spirit and not fulfilling the lust of the flesh, it's OK to remain ignorant about that. No wonder the professing church is so sick...cd: Thank you for that info on Romans 8:1 It was as you stated in the Greek and the Hebrew. KJ right again. Glad to hear that Guy repented sis :-)From: Judy TaylorDean writes:The problem I have with the NASV is it took the words of Jesus away
DAVEH: I wonder if the TTers who have criticized me (LDS theology) for adding/subtracting from the Word are as critical when they view the NASV or other translations that s eemingly change what is conveyed i n Bible. Again....just pondering this out loud.....no need to respond, Dean.cd : Good point Dave-and I think it deserves an answer. Brothers and Sisters in Christ do you have an answer for Daves question as to why we allow our Bibles to remove God's words with no objections and cut Smith to pieces for doing the same thing???I second both DaveH and Dean's observations but haven't seen many responses thus far. What is the difference betweenusing Gk and exegesis to correct what is written and the Mormon stance which says they will accept the Word of God insofar as it is correctly translated. Both are saying/doing the same thing which puts truth at the mercy of smart men and their scholarship.So the Plumbline is now removed. It is time to apologize to the Mormons and repent....
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
