I find it a rule that Perverts are generally not bothered by sexual inuendo and crass sexual comments.
 
There is only one thing worse than a pervert. It is one who justifies the sin & the sinner.
 
I will preach to a pervert, but those who justify the sin are reprobates and beyond help. God calls them an  abomination

Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Lance, the principle I was taught is that when you offend someone you
apologize...even if you didn't mean to, even if you were joking, even if you
think they are faking offense, apologizing is the right thing to do. Izzy
got it. Kevin got it. Evidently arrogant people don't get it.

While I have railed heavily against Dave's faith, I have not generally
maligned the man. But, having been given this door of opportunity, let me
say how I really feel...

It is not that Dave is a mormon. That is an unfortunate coincidence. It is
that he has behaved arrogantly. It is that has insulted most all on this
forum by arrogantly stating that "he is not here to learn the truth, he is
here to learn what protestants believe". It is that he has said he is here
to learn, but after being told over and over, he fails to learn. It is that
he has said he is not here to teach, then has proselytized us with his satan
inspired faith. It is that he levies his often tasteless humor on others,
but when they have been offended, he has rationalized his behavior, while
belittling the offended. He has taken the words of others and intentionally
twisted them to mean something else, then posted them. When claims are made
about his behavior, his memory is bad, but when he wants to make claims
against others, his memory is restored.

And, it was HE who changed the subject line of the posts in question to
"Izzies Sexual Experiences". He is the one who twisted Dean's call for
moderation, to suggesting that I might know something of Izzies sexual
experiences. HE is the one with the perverse mind. HE is the one who does
not know where to draw the line on his so-called humor. And HIS response is
an arrogant rationalaztion that it is okay for him to say these things, and
for us to be opffended? Back off, Elder Muir!

Perry

>From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
>To:
>Subject: [TruthTalk] Charles Perry Lock says 'A totally arrogant and
>insensitive reply, IMO' of Dave Hansen
>Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:53:48 -0500
>
>I have a sense of DaveH that he ain't got it in 'em but, should anyone's
>door need showin' up at ...well...it's pretty obvious to me who they'd be.
>He's been spoken to and about with ill intent pretty much daily. As Tom
>Snyder used to say of people who behave like you guys have..'go to a
>mirror, look into it and, call yourself...(guess)
>
>IMO Perry, you're doing this more because he's a Mormon than because of
>what he purportedly meant by what he said.
>
>Iz rather graciously acknowledged her own participation and, requested that
>you let this go. Why not do that, Perry?


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.

Reply via email to