On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:35:48 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frankly, the most ridiculous criticism of Barth I have ever seen.An absolutely laughable commentary.It's a short note and hardly a commentary but have a good laugh on me ...Barth's regard for the scripture's far exceeds anything I have read in your post.He appeals to no other source of information.When you don't believe your source to be accurate it opens the door to adding or subtracting at will.You criticize him for denying the infallibility of scripture (something that is an outright lie) while, at the same time, having no clue (talking about you, Judy) as to a definition for "inspiration." Heck, you can't even tell the difference between inspiration and revelation !!!The Holy Spirit is both inspiration and the source of divine revelation JD. Who has no clue? There's that oldaccuser again.Don't waste our time with some internet BS quotation that seems to show that Barth is in line with your claim about inerrancy.Correction: Barth is NOT in line with my claim that the scriptures are inerrant.The fact of the matter is this : I challenge you to find a statement of Barth in his Dogmatics that challenges the wording of scripture and places his opinion above holy writ.You really think I would spend time wading through his "dogmatics" to find something like that for you to shoot down JD?
From: Judy Taylor <jandgtaylor1@juno.com>I know he would not pledge allegiance to Hitler which is noteworthy but the very fact that Hitler and his occult socialist system gained that much control in his country somewhat proves the impotency of his message. He did teach at a University there - right? So he influenced others with his unbelief. God judges Barth the man. I evaluate Barf the theologian who does not believe God's Word to be inerrant.On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:05:01 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Your use of "Barf" is both a contradiction to your shallow claim that you do not judge Barth and a clear statement to the fact that you know nothing of what this man believes and the concerns he dealt with in his battle against liberal theologies (among other considerations.)
-----Original Message-----
From: Judy Taylor <jandgtaylor1@juno.com>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 07:46:22 -0500
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once aga in employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
I am not in any position to judge Barf's personal life and neither are you Lance. Calvins' was a bit more public.And didn't you write the following "I've met the 'Huntmeister' and, we spoke. He's big into this 'end times' drivel. . "Talk about the pot calling the kettle black, isn't the above a truly shallow, petulant, and uniformed caricature & reprehensible?On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 07:35:56 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:This man served our Lord faithfully throughout his life as did John Calvin. To take note of these truly shallow, petulant, and uniformed caricatures is reprehensible. What 'spirit' inhabits such an one as this? Take care Judy"From: Judy TaylorFootnotes?? Only if the original thought makes any sense. Barf definitely would not qualify.On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 06:06:20 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:One would not have thought you so easily impressed, Judy. Ya wants footnotes? May I suggest Karl Barth? I've met the 'Huntmeister' and, we spoke. He's big into this 'end times' drivel. .
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
