|
Ha, ha, Lance, very funny. No, no slips this
time (thank goodness!). I prefer to speak of her as "W" rather than
"E" when referencing pre-fall events; that's all. She was, after all,
"named" or "called" (both are translations of the same word)
"Woman" prior to receiving a second name after her encounter in the
garden.
Bill
Bill speaks of 'A&W'?? Hmmmmm...Freudian
slip? Bill's favourite FF place? A hidden agenda?
Good root beer? (as close as Bill gets to
'beer'?) We had all best ponder this encrypted message from our vaunted
theologian!
----- Original Message -----
Sent: December 09, 2005 09:13
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] New
Subject-A&E
Amen. -----Original Message----- From:
Taylor < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent:
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 05:57:00 -0700 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] New
Subject-A&E
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005
5:20 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] New
Subject-A&E
So they were created one of two
ways. They were either eternal with the ability to
fall through disobedience -
OR they were created like us which
is mortal and dying as we live
with access to the tree of life?
More added words: you are setting up a strawman, Judy.
Go back to what has been said and see the distinction.
No strawman here
Bill.
When you add the word
"dying" to our words, Judy, you are setting up a
strawman. God did not create a dying people -- John did not
say that, and neither did I. As long as A&W were eating
of the tree of life, there was no death in them whatsoever.
Hence, what we are saying -- or at least I am -- is that God
created a people with the potential to die. If you will
accept this distinction, I will be happy to continue our
discussion. If not, then there is nothing to
discuss.
Bill
|
