..what if, perhaps. elemental to BTs commentary, there genuinely appears to be a qualitatively greater revelation than your 'greater revelation'? 
 
 
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 20:18:48 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
e.g., let's say BT (of TT) confidently comments creatively on necessities (also, germane to Protestant thought, i suspect) disclosed discreetly from certain revelation  per se and all that you (two & cult-apostles like DavidM) would have to say about it is that he (too) rejects 'greater revelation'?
 
 
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 22:02:45 -0800 Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DAVEH:   Certainly, none on TT.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what Protestants would say they need it?
 
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 21:07:00 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
..Protestants ..have rejected the greater revelation,
||
 

Reply via email to