I invite you to read again Peter's sermon in Acts 2.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 7:01 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?

 
 
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:07:06 -0700 "Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
 
That does not surprise me.

I did answer the question. Paul was not addressing a challenge against Jesus' humanity.
That heresy sprang up later. John addresses it.
 
No Bill - I didn't write it as a challenge. Paul is just making a statement of fact which is that
Jesus came to do good and to heal all who were oppressed of the devil for God was WITH him.
Looks to me like Paul could just as easily have writted "for he is God" if that were the case or
is that too difficult in Greek?
 
I certainly do believe that God was with him, Judy; in fact, I also believe he was God. Bill
 
Then why doesn't Paul say that in the book of Acts?  We know that the risen Christ is "King of Kings"
and "Lord of Lords" but he didn't walk that way amongst men. 
 
cd: Bill if there is anything that came out of this discussion it is making me rethink the Jesus as God idea.
 

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Plains.Net, and is
believed to be clean.
 

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Plains.Net, and is
believed to be clean.

Reply via email to