Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 03:41:31 -0800

 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/30/2006 9:15:56 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?

 
 
cd: I think I can if you would be so kind as to point out that passage for me Bill. 
 
jd wrote this text.....not Bill.   The scritpure you asked for is in the paragraph. 
 
 
 
Secondly,  we know that Christ was like us, in every respect.  That is the declaration of scripture.   You and Judy apparently enjoy camping on "Like" for the purpose of showing the rest of us that He is not like us !!!    What is the point of Hebrews 2:14-18 if it is not that He is an effective minister to us because He knows what it is like to be human  --  like us??  I do not think you can answer this question.  
------------------------
 
cd: John where is the words" in every respect" in the below Hebrews 2:14-18? As a lost heathen I was a captive of Satan was Christ also a lost man held captive by Satan? There is a difference. Can you hear the answer I am giving to your question?
 

Heb 2:14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;

Heb 2:15 And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.

Heb 2:16 For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.

Heb 2:17 Wherefore in all things it behooved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.

Heb 2:18 For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succor them that are tempted.

 
. 
 
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:
Sent: 1/29/2006 10:22:12 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?

Something else, Dean.   It has occurred to me that you and Judy believe in two Adams , neither of which is Christ.   You have Adam before the "fall"  a totally different kind of being than the Adam after the falll.   Such is nowhere discussed in scripture.  If I asked for a scripture that speaks to the creaturely Adam as changed in terms of human nature and physical being, you couldn't do  -  so I will not ask.   What bothers me is that that this failure does not bother you while, at the same time, preaching  against "adding to or taking from the meaning (words) " of the revealation of God. 
 
Secondly,  we know that Christ was like us, in every respect.  That is the declaration of scripture.   You and Judy apparently enjoy camping on "Like" for the purpose of showing the rest of us that He is not like us !!!    What is the point of Hebrews 2:14-18 if it is not that He is an effective minister to us because He knows what it is like to be human  --  like us??  I do not think you can answer this question.  
 
cd: I think I can if you would be so kind as to point out that passage for me Bill. 
 
 
 
 
 
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 
If Jesus was not of the first Adam, he was not his descendant and, therefore, was not qualified to bear his name. You and yours are way to American in this regard: you have no respect for heritage, lineage, kinship, family ties. To know the Jesus of Scripture, you need know him as he was in his culture, Dean -- not yours.
 
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: Dean Moore
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 4:52 PM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?

 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 1/29/2006 6:18:57 PM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?


Amen!
Now this is good doctrine.  Thank you Dean, what a blessing you are in the Lord..
 
cd: Thanks sister-you are a blessing to me also-The writing that you did concerning the second man Adam should convince anyone who doesn't hold a bias.The second man Adam clearly was different from the first man Adam.He was strong with sanctification whereas the first man Adam wasn't-We were of the first while Jesus was of the second-No higher Priesthood exists.
 
From: "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No, I think I will stay the course Bill. The Law mentioned was only weak
in our flesh not Christ's flesh-He came in the "likeness of that flesh" but
the law worked in Him who was not weak. This supports my view-disagree?
Then here's another verse to help.

Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet
sinners, Christ died for us.

His death was the victory not His life.
 
 
 

> From: Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>
> Date: 1/29/2006 2:05:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]  Was Jesus of God's Nature?
>
> Christ came in the lower state for death on the cross thereby defeating
> Satan-for victory-not to spend His life warring against sin in His
members-
> for victory.
>
> You might want to rethink that one, Dean:
>
> "For what the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God
> did by sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, on account of
> sin: He condemned sin in the flesh" (Rom 8.3).
 
cd:No, I think I will stay the course Bill. The Law mentioned was only weak
in our flesh not Christ's flesh-He came in the "likeness of that flesh" but
the law worked in Him who was not weak. This supports my view-disagree?
Then here's another verse to help.
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet
sinners, Christ died for us.
His death was the victory not His life.
>
 
 
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
 
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
 
 

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Plains.Net, and is
believed to be clean.

Reply via email to