I am talking about what we teach in school and Judy comes back with something about "the secret things" and then Kevin, bless his little heart, comes back with something about reading the Bible --- NEW FLASH !!! Obviously TT as a DISCUSSION GROUP died some time ago !!
Over here , guys !! I am the one talking about .............. oh, never mind.
You guys are a hoot !! At least I don't have to worry about defending myself since none of us are talking about the same things -- and you guys believe unity is "speaking and thinking the same things??"" LOL !!
jd
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It is in the Bible READ IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:what on earth are you talking about, Judy !!!???? Secret things ??? So you decided to just stay off subject? Whatever.-------------- Original message --------------
From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Some ppl are willing to let God be God JDThe secret things belong to the Lord and as Kevin says; let the ppl servingCaesar fumble around and follow whatever way the wind is blowing.On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:34:20 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Someone saidrender to Cesear what is Cesear's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:So which fundamentalist version of creation do you support. That A & E were spirit people. A 6000 year date or a 10,000 or an "unknown" e.t. ? The version that says it took God 144 hours to speak words that can be spoken in 24 seconds !!! I just did it in 24 big ones !! including a drink of water because my mouth was getting dry.Consensus has NOTHING to do with !! Rad Fundies cannot agree on much of anything. Which version goes into the school system ??? We are still waiting??jd-------------- Original message --------------
From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Don't you get it JT?TRUTH is found in CONSENSUS!The opinions of Men are the key.....
Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:So?There isn't a single fiew of the whole church that is agreed uponby the whole church either. What does that prove? judytOn Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:27:56 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Perhaps the Bishop has the same concerns I do. I know this --there isn't a single view of creationism that is agreed upon by the whole church.jd-------------- Original message --------------
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John wrote:> The world in which we live would reject> any mention of God in the evolutionary process,> IMO. But creationism in the schools? Could> that not be considered the beginnings of a fanatical> fundamentalist take-over of the culture?ROTFLOL. I sure hope you were being facetious on purpose.John wrote:> But to allow a mere statement that suggests God> is somehow in control as the Creator(?) If this> could be presented into the secular system of> education without it being coopted by the fundies> -- go for it. But I doubt that it can. What a shame> that radical fundamentalism within Christiandom forces> the Body to dismiss a perfectly wonderful opportunity> to introduce the Creator to others.In case you did not notice, the fundamentalists are not causing the acknowledgement of our Creator to be forbidden in schools. It is the liberal loonies like this Archbishop of Canterbury who are doing this.David Miller
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
