On 18/02/13 00:22 +0100, Raimon Esteve wrote: > We need this two modules in Spain companies. Jordi said differences and > can't depend one module to another module.
The examples he gived was not very confincing.
> Remember first time was a module
> and two templates. Cedrick propose to split in two modules and we are agree.
I still maintain this proposal.
> We have experience about update XML in l10n_es. It's very tired and you can
> get mistakes. In a TUC, we tolk about mamagement in CSV files a py script
> to generate XML. More easy. Of course you can edit XML same as OpenERP, but
> in csv you is more easy to management (and account users!).
Can you give at least 1 argument about this?
I don't understand how it could be different to maintain a CSV file and
a XML file?
> 6 people was agree to csv management. Trytonspain group worked to openerp
> xml to csv and after csv to tryton xml.
> You have source code in bitbucket,org/trytonspain
Ok but where does the openerp data comes from?
For example, how are the account name strict/immutable?
> If the problem is account pyme module, forget in hg.tryton module. We need
> it, and we mantain it (from trytonspain).
No, the problem is quality and standard.
I see some fuzzy stuffs in them, I already make comments on the review
about the respect of guide lines.
But I have two major issues with the two modules:
- duplication of data
- the taxes de-multiplication
> Last point, account es and account pyme module are working in tryton
> production.
That doesn't make them in better quality.
--
Cédric Krier
B2CK SPRL
Rue de Rotterdam, 4
4000 Liège
Belgium
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpPFRUtCoob8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
