On 25 Jan 22:32, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > 2014-01-25 Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>: > > On 25 Jan 21:59, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > >> In other cases, though, it is a set of products that are changed from > >> "Reduced VAT" to "Standard VAT" even if the percentages of those types > >> do not change. > >> > >> This would require making taxes on products depend on dates. In this > >> case, not sure about the others, it seems it'd be somewhat better to > >> define a "Tax Period" that defines the date interval the taxes should > >> be applied. This way, encoding would be faster and less error prone > >> than having to specify for each product the date and the tax. > > > > It don't think it is necessary. You just have to change the taxes on the > > products. Because tax links are copied on the invoice line so changing > > it on product doesn't impact to existing invoices. More over for the > > tricky case, accountant can still edit the default taxes on the invoice. > > Right, but you must ensure that you change the tax of those products > just the day the law change applies. The advantage of dates is that > you can start changing product taxes days before the system actually > has to use them.
I agree that tools to update large set of products would be necessary. I think it is better to update with such tool on the right date than manually months before update all products. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpyol_FFKciT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
