On 26/05/2015 15:18, Cédric Krier wrote: > On 26 May 14:35, Nicolas Évrard wrote: >> * Pierre-Louis Bonicoli [2015-05-26 13:58 +0200]: >>> If the chosen solution is the mapping one, the documentation (core and >>> each module) should list the names of the tables. >> >> Why should it? >> >> If it's up to the administrators of the tryton server to decide which >> name a table should have through configuration why should we add this >> information in the documentation? We might as well define the name of >> the tables in the objects if this information is static. >> >> But of course the mapping defined in the configuration has to be known >> by people using other systems to access the data. But this is up to >> the people implementing their ERP to provide this information. > > Indeed it is the opposite, if we implement the pilou proposal we will > have to document the table name that each Model will get under every > conditions (each backend constraint).
Why would that be needed ? -- Pierre-Louis
