[resend, g$ggle still broke, apparently] full upgrade with recent 'develop' shows the following:
4815 140668832162880 [2017-05-01 16:35:10,058] WARNING trytond.backend.postgresql.table Unable to set column company of table account_fiscalyear_invoice_sequence not null ! Try to re-run: trytond.py --update=module If it doesn't work, update records and execute manually: ALTER TABLE "account_fiscalyear_invoice_sequence" ALTER COLUMN "company" SET NOT NULL
Indeed I have 25 records where company is not set here (single company db). Is this a case where I need to manually set the company (id=1), or is it a possible omission in the migration code to check? I see as well:
4815 140668832162880 [2017-05-01 16:35:29,739] INFO trytond.convert Deleting 58@ir.property from account_payment.property_payment_group_sequence 4815 140668832162880 [2017-05-01 16:35:29,739] WARNING trytond.convert Could not delete id 58 of model ir.property because model no longer exists. 4815 140668832162880 [2017-05-01 16:35:29,760] INFO trytond.convert Deleting 57@ir.property from product.property_cost_price_method 4815 140668832162880 [2017-05-01 16:35:29,761] WARNING trytond.convert Could not delete id 57 of model ir.property because model no longer exists. 4815 140668832162880 [2017-05-01 16:35:29,761] INFO trytond.convert Deleting 1@ir.property from product.property_product_cost_price_method 4815 140668832162880 [2017-05-01 16:35:29,762] WARNING trytond.convert Could not delete id 1 of model ir.property because model no longer exists. 4815 140668832162880 [2017-05-01 16:35:29,773] INFO trytond.convert Deleting 2@ir.property from party.property_party_sequence 4815 140668832162880 [2017-05-01 16:35:29,774] WARNING trytond.convert Could not delete id 2 of model ir.property because model no longer exists.
Not clear if these can simply be deleted or not.
id | create_uid | create_date | res | value | write_uid | field | write_date | company ----+------------+----------------------------+-----+---------------+-----------+-------+------------+--------- 1 | 0 | 2015-03-22 04:43:04.18063 | | ,fixed | | 732 | | 2 | 0 | 2015-03-22 04:44:17.036349 | | ir.sequence,1 | | 909 | | 57 | 0 | 2016-05-06 17:12:16.543205 | | ,fixed | | 732 | | 58 | 0 | 2016-05-07 03:53:08.345128 | | ir.sequence,4 | | 2404 | | (4 lignes)
I noticed that there are two other records with a null 'res', namely for the default client and supplier accounts in account.account. I guess I presume they are okay but should there be some value set for 'res'? Something like 'party.party,1' which is the party id of the company? Cheers, -- Richard PALO -- Richard PALO -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton-dev" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton-dev/3b2c72fe-864f-7dfd-b8fb-365d09a29e1c%40netbsd.org.
