On 2 July 2010 18:18, Udo Spallek <udo.spal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> 2. Why is there an inconsistency between removing a field from every >> party.address form view (which works) and removing a field from every >> party.address tree view (which doesn't work)? Is this a bug? Should I >> file a bug report? > I can not see an inconsistency so far, since you may forget to remove > the field from the right place.
While your solution worked and I'm glad it did, I'm somewhat mystified by the fact that streetbis (and indeed the party.address treeview) was redefined in party.party when it's already defined in party.address Best, Elver > > Cheers > Udo > -- > Udo Spallek > > ------------------------------------ > virtual things > Preisler & Spallek GbR > Munich - Aix-la-Chapelle > > Windeckstr. 77 > 81375 Munich - Germany > Tel: +49 (89) 710 481 55 > Fax: +49 (89) 710 481 56 > > i...@virtual-things.biz > http://www.virtual-things.biz > > > -- > tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list -- tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
