On 2015-08-18 12:00, Maria Cecilia Santos Popper wrote: > On Tuesday, August 18, 2015, Cédric Krier <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 2015-08-18 20:02, David Bruchmann wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> In our case (Argentina) POS sales are usually the case with sales over > > > > the counter where the client picks up the product. We have a kind of > > tax > > > > entity called "Final Consumer" for this type of client. This type of > > > > transaction does not require to show the tax ammount in the invoice > > report > > > > (though the tax is included in the price and the company needs to > > declare > > > > it at the end of the taxable month/semester/year). > > > > We have a special type of invoice for this kind of sales: It is a > > legal > > > > invoice but the tax is not detailed). > > > > In our case, we are are using the *sale_pos > > > > <https://bitbucket.org/zikzakmedia/trytond-sale_pos>* from > > ZikZaKMedia, > > > > which also haves an option to set "Self PIck UP" by default so it > > handles > > > > stock movements automatically. > > > > > > > > > > > > > This shows what I thought already, that taxes are not handled the same in > > > each country, > > > > I higly doubt about that. A Tax is simply a tax. > Just a side note to clarify in regard to my comment about taxes and types > of invoices. In Argentina one may need to use three different type of > invoices: A, b or c. The first one is used to bill companies, the second > one to end users (final consumer where tax isI included)
I don't understand that. Is the type of invoice depends on how you display the price on the product? That sounds very strange. > and the third one > to tax exent organizations. I don't understand what is that? > So in Tryton we use three different sequences > to handle invoices according to the type of customer. This is managed by > the account__ar module created by Gcoop (sorry I don't provide with a link > but I'm on the road with little access to data coverage). This module adds > a field in the party's module where you can set the Vat condition for that > party (a, b or c). But that sounds like the tax rules. Why creating something else? > Just to comment how invoices are handled and that, in > our case, there are different types. But I still think your are mixing invoice with POS receipt. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
