Hi,

Below:


> On Jul 24, 2022, at 3:03 AM, Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Inline
> 
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 08:10:43PM -0400, Stuart Cheshire wrote:
>> I feel that in retrospect the name “congestion control” was a poor choice. 
>> Too often when I talk to people building their own home-grown transport 
>> protocol on top of UDP, and I ask them what congestion control algorithm 
>> they use, they smile smugly and say, “We don’t need congestion control.” 
>> They explain that their protocol won’t be used on congested networks.

I agree SO strongly !!!!!
The main problem of congestion control these days appears to be that networks 
are mostly underutilized (see the thread on ICCRG I started by pointing at our 
ComMag paper) - the issue is to increase the rate as quickly as possible, 
without producing congestion.

It should really be called “rate control”.
It’s about a sending rate - whether that is indirectly achieved by controlling 
a window or explicitly by changing a rate in bits per second doesn’t really 
matter.

Cheers,
Michael

Reply via email to