> > One thought is that we set up a shadow RRG operating independently of > the IETF meeting but meeting concurrently and at the same location. This > is what BoFs used to be before the IETF apparatus got hold of them and > formalised them. We can still use the draft infrastructure. If we cannot > have a IETF list, there is groups.io or similar. All a bit like Internet > Routing where we route around damage to the infrastructure.
> I'd be all for this idea. path exploration? but consider the shadow pricing... the tradeoff between convergence rate and congestion control seems to be something that ought to be put on a more systematic grounding cheers j
