This is definitely a legal statement, but why mention JDK here if we do not mention it anywhere else... On Wednesday 16 May 2001 01:39, you wrote: > dlr 01/05/16 01:39:08 > > Modified: xdocs index.xml > Log: > Added note about JDK version suggested by Kurt Schrader > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.16 +2 -1 jakarta-turbine/xdocs/index.xml > > Index: index.xml > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-turbine/xdocs/index.xml,v > retrieving revision 1.15 > retrieving revision 1.16 > diff -u -r1.15 -r1.16 > --- index.xml 2001/05/13 04:29:13 1.15 > +++ index.xml 2001/05/16 08:39:05 1.16 > @@ -158,7 +158,8 @@ > <section name="Where is the latest TDK?"> > <p> > TDK 1.1 versions are available <a > -href="http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/tdk/";>Here</a>. > +href="http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/tdk/";>here</a> (JDK 1.2 or > +higher required). > </p> > </section> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
