"Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >[Comments inline. Sorry for the delay, JavaOne last week and away for
> >the weekend.]
>
> No prob. I wasn't around anyway, had to visit my parents-in-law =%-)
Heh, next weekend I'll have some of those myself!
> >I agree. Can we call it keySequence()--or just plain sequence()--
> >instead of keyList()?
>
> Sure. sequence() is IMHO the best name.
Okay, have at it.
> >I appreciate you providing such a thorough example, but this would
> >break backwards compatibility by moving SequencedHashtable from the
> >Map to Collection interface. Though the sequence is a nice by-product
> >of the implementation, I consider SequencedHashtable to intrinsically
> >be a Map implementation.
>
> Sure. I see it like this, too. A shame that there is no way to
> implement both interfaces. The class itself was more of a by-product of
> some code tinkering.
It is a shame. When you add the sequence() instance method, perhaps
you could add a little more to my "cryptic note" about why both
interface cannot be implemented. ;)
Thanks,
Daniel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
