> I tried at first to make a WM context adapter and ran into the problem
> of every last friggin' method in WM so that I couldn't
> override get/put
> in a WM context in order to make an adapter. Easy enough to fix, but
> than I said why bother. WM is so complicated internally compared to
> Velocity and they are so similar in syntax that I don't see much point
> in supporting them both. Is anyone using FreeMarker?
Of course, the more mechanisms you support, the better it looks
for the architecture... However, if this is hindering the pace of
development, without giving any real benefits, I say dump them.
I only use Velocity anyway.
> I would like to call what is being worked on Turbine 3.0 and dump
> all view mechanisms except velocity and jsp.
+1.
> Jason van Zyl
--
Gonzalo A. Diethelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
