On 7/24/01 2:13 PM, "Fedor Karpelevitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:13 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [vote]2.x release
>> 
>> 
>> situation:
>> there are many bug-fixes in cvs which should land in a 2.x release.
>> on the other hand some stuff (castor, freemarker, ...) should
>> be deprecated in
>> 2.x to follow our deprecation rules (or we must add all the
>> stuff to 3.0 :-( )
>> 
>> options:
>> A) a 2.1.1 release with all the bug-fixes without deprecation
>> + a 2.2 release 
>> with deprecations (doesn't make sense, does it??)
> 
> -1
> 
>> 
>> B) a 2.2 release with bugfixes + deprecations
>> there will be no api changes in 2.2 only deprecations -> all
>> 2.1 apps would work
>> fine, but their might be some warnings at compile time
> 
> -1
> 
> it's not "fine" to have "some warning"
> it's just wrong to do it like that.
> 
> 2.1.1 (or call it 2.2 - i do not care but prefer 2.1.1) should be a
> bugfix-only
> 
> a deprecation release by itself makes no sense so the options are:
> 
> 1) include the deprecated stuff into 3.0 (i guess you do not like that)

In some cases this just won't be possible with the changes made. I think
it is perfectly acceptable to change the API across major versions.

> 2) change DP or make an exception in this case and simply drop the staff
> without deprecation. (this is harsh but seems to be the most viable and ok
> for RL according to the claims that no one was using that stuff anyway)

I think this is ok as long as the migration process is well documented
which I plan to be the case.
 
> fedor.
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> i'll be on vacation from 4. - 17. august and i would like to
>> have a 2.x release
>> before my vacation.
>> 
>> PLEASE VOTE!!
>> 
>> martin
>> 
>> ps: my vote  A +0, B +1
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 

jvz.

Jason van Zyl

http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to