I see. Hmmm...so if you don't mind me asking, what's the purpose behind this migration? Didn't see much discussion on the mailing list about this...(or I might've missed it in the noise)
Is it an Apache-level move towards stratum.configuration, or is the purpose for the Turbine project to be more self-contained? And of course, the reply begs the question: if it's more or less the same, why move? :) Haven't seen the stratum.configuration package (think it was introduced yesterday or the day before only), but is it a wrapper around ExtendedProps or an implementation as well? K ----- Original Message ----- From: Martin Poeschl To: Turbine Developers List Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 4:47 PM Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-turbine-torque/src/java/org/apache/torque/oid IDBroker.java Kelvin Tan wrote: > I've noticed a bunch of commits moving away from Commons' ExtendedProperties, towards stratum.configuration. > > How stable is stratum.configuration wrt to ExtendedProperties? Would you consider it production-quality? the code for the configuration package is more or less the same as ExtendedProperties > > Regards, > Kelvin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
