On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 11:03, Kurt Schrader wrote:
>
> On 13 Mar 2002, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> > There has long been available a mode where a 'cvs layout' is produced
> > that looks something like what scarab does. It's exploits the
> > ${applicationRoot} variable to allow a Turbine project to be run from
> > its 'cvs layout' location directly. This method isn't perfect,
> > especially when URLs are used to retrieve resources - in this case some
> > content must still be copied into the servlet container. But at any rate
> > I think we should settle on the one mode and run with it. I believe the
> > 'cvs layout' mode is more viable in the long run.
>
> +1 for 3.0 TDK.
> -0 for 2.2 TDK, I think that people need to be able to upgrade their 2.1
> applications easily, and that currently there are already enough changes
> that have to be made to projects that just want to upgrade, without making
> them change this too.
They are just going to have to do the same thing if they move to 3.0.
What if there was something to move them forward?
I was never expecting to have to maintain the process for development
but it has happened and people use the TDK. But resources are limited
and I'm not interested in supporting both the modes.
> -Kurt
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.zenplex.org
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
