This was the only one that I came across. Are there more? This
sounds like a deficiency in the SecurityService, rather than a problem
in Torque. Is there something that can be done to correct the
SecurityService?
John McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> this will break the security service in fulcrum. Some torque generated
> objects implement an interface that does not allow the save method to
> throw a TorqueException.
>
> john mcnally
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
>> dlr 02/03/13 09:51:31
>>
>> Modified: src/templates/om Object.vm
>> Log:
>> save() should throw TorqueException, rather than vanilla Exception.
>>
>> Revision Changes Path
>> 1.22 +1 -1 jakarta-turbine-torque/src/templates/om/Object.vm
>>
>> Index: Object.vm
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-turbine-torque/src/templates/om/Object.vm,v
>> retrieving revision 1.21
>> retrieving revision 1.22
>> diff -u -u -r1.21 -r1.22
>> --- Object.vm 2 Mar 2002 02:23:55 -0000 1.21
>> +++ Object.vm 13 Mar 2002 17:51:31 -0000 1.22
>> @@ -771,7 +771,7 @@
>> * Stores the object in the database. If the object is new,
>> * it inserts it; otherwise an update is performed.
>> */
>> - public void save() throws Exception
>> + public void save() throws TorqueException
>> {
>> #if ($complexObjectModel)
>> save(${table.JavaName}Peer.getMapBuilder()
>>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
