James Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Another question: A while ago I remember we were talking about making
> GroupCache the only cache, and eliminating the existing Cache (really
> merging the two into one Cache and associated classes). It is clear that
> GroupCache offers more flexibility and power. If it performs close to as
> well then I would like to do this since it reduces the complexity of JCS
> and the amount of code we have to maintain. Getting the core of JCS down
> to a more manageable size is important if we want it to see wider use.

I would also like there to be less classes in JCS.  I haven't looked
at it as much as I like because of the shear volume of code.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to