+1, I think this will be of great benefit to both projects. On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 10:07, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose some further separation of some of the turbine > code and the creation of two more mailing lists ... all in preparation > for separating a couple pieces of turbine into their own projects. > > Right now I think we have two candidates for this process: > > Torque > JCS > > Torque has its own repository, but I think it would be good have a > separate mailing list to prepare for separation into its own project. I > don't think it's near ready enough to be proposed as a top-level > subproject and I would really like to encourage some cross-pollentation > between Torque and ObjectBridge. I think a separate mailing list would > certainly help facilitate this. > > I think JCS is big enough on it's own to be in its own repository with > its own build. John and James are working on it but I think the cruft > needs to be cleaned up and more people need to try it before it can be > proposed as a top-level subproject. But again I think a separate mailing > list would be wise. > > Fulcrum probably will go down the same road but I don't think it has the > attention yet. > > But I think it would be great to clean Torque and JCS up and get them > out of here so they can be used by a wider audience. > > > -- > jvz. > > Jason van Zyl > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://tambora.zenplex.org > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
